![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management Commissioner - Adjudicators Orders |
RA MeekREFERENCE: 0194-2000
INTERIM ORDER OF AN
ADJUDICATOR
MADE UNDER PART 10 OF CHAPTER 6
BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT
1997
| Number of Scheme: | 10927 |
| Name of Scheme: | Admiral North |
| Address of Scheme: | 14 Macarthur Parade MAIN BEACH QLD 4217 |
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to an application made under the abovementioned Act by the Body Corporate
RA MeekI hereby
order that the application by the body corporate for an interim order that
that the body corporate committee undertake removal of structures
erected on
common property under exclusive use of lot 48, at the cost of the owner of lot
48, is dismissed. n
STATEMENT OF ADJUDICATOR’S REASONS FOR
DECISION - REF 0194-2000
“Admiral North ” CMS
10927
The applicant, the Body Corporate for Admiral North has sought the
following order of an adjudicator under the Body Corporate and
Community
Management Act 1997 (the Act), quote -
An interim order that the body corporate committee undertake removal of structures erected on common property under exclusive use of lot 48, at the cost of the owner of lot 48.
The body corporate also sought an
interim order as a Committee Meeting could be called at any time.
Presumably the purpose of obtaining an interim order is that the
committee could then take steps to implement the order, if favourable,
at its
next committee meeting.
Section 225(1) provides that an adjudicator may
make an interim order if satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that an interim order
is
necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the
application relates. An adjudicator’s order may
contain ancillary or
consequential provisions the adjudicator considers necessary or appropriate
(section 230(1)).
In any consideration of an application which seeks the
making of an interim order, it is necessary to determine at the outset whether,
because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances relating to the
application, an interim order is in fact necessary or appropriate.
The examples
included in the Act under section 225(1) are suggestive of the usual
circumstances where an interim order might be made.
Both examples are in the
nature of injunctive relief. Whilst the range of matters which might be the
subject of an interim order
is not capable of definition, the applicant does
need to establish that the circumstances of the application warrant the making
of
an interim order.
An interim order will not be made, or will be
refused, in circumstances where the only urgency relates to the
applicant’s desire
to resolve or expedite the matters in dispute, or where
the nature of the circumstances are such that the matter is not capable of
being
dealt with in the context of an interim order. Again, it is not possible to
define these circumstances. However, given that
an interim order may be made ex
parte (ie. without reference to, or submission from the respondent named in the
matter), then as
a guide, where the circumstances or matters in dispute include
matters or allegations not capable of objective consideration, or
ready
determination, or relate to issues of credibility or character, for example,
where an interim order would be inappropriate,
then the request for an interim
order will be refused. It is a matter for an adjudicator to determine in respect
of each application.
There is no aspect of urgency associated with this
application that requires that an interim order be made. The structures which
the
body corporate seek to have removed are not about to be erected; rather they
have been in place for approximately 12 months now.
An interim order would only
be relevant to prevent the threatened erection of structures where there were
questions as to their legality.
Moreover, the nature of the matters raised are
not such that they can be effectively addressed or dealt with by way of an
interim
order. Rather, they require full investigation, including submissions
from other parties to the dispute, before any order can be
made. Accordingly,
this application for an interim order is dismissed.
This matter will now
be investigated in accordance with the usual processes undertaken by this
office. A final order regarding the
application will be made in due course.
n
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2000/188.html