![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Supreme Court of New South Wales |
Last Updated: 7 September 2010
NEW SOUTH WALES SUPREME COURT
CITATION:
Davis Estate –
Application of May [2010] NSWSC 989
JURISDICTION:
Equity
Division
Probate List
FILE NUMBER(S):
2010/073086
HEARING
DATE(S):
30 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE:
30 August 2010
EX
TEMPORE DATE:
30 August 2010
PARTIES:
Mary Phillipa May
(Applicant)
JUDGMENT OF:
Palmer J
LOWER COURT
JURISDICTION:
Not Applicable
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):
Not
Applicable
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER:
Not
Applicable
COUNSEL:
A.J. Grant (Applicant)
SOLICITORS:
Walsh & Associates (Applicant)
CATCHWORDS:
SUCCESSION
– WILLS – RECTIFICATION – no point of
principle.
LEGISLATION CITED:
Succession Act 2006 (NSW) – s
27
CATEGORY:
Principal judgment
CASES CITED:
TEXTS
CITED:
DECISION:
Will rectified.
JUDGMENT:
2010/073086 Davis Estate – Application of Mary Phillipa
May
JUDGMENT – Ex tempore
30 August,
2010
1 This is an application under s 27 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) for rectification of the will of the late Mary Juletta Davis. The Plaintiff seeks rectification by the deletion of the name of Mr Justin Davis from clause 3A of the will. That rectification would have the effect of dividing the estate into six, rather than seven, parts, and the last of the six parts would be given to Mr Justin Davis jointly with his then wife.
2 The affidavit of the solicitor who took instructions for the will and drafted it, reveals the clearest case of error in complying with the intentions of the deceased. It is very clear from that affidavit that the deceased intended to divide her residuary estate into six portions and that one of those portions was to go to her son, Justin, and his then wife, jointly. That intention clearly miscarried by a typographical error when the will was finally prepared because Justin’s name was included twice. The error was not detected by the solicitor prior to the execution of the will by the deceased.
3 Accordingly, I am entirely satisfied that the orders sought should be made so as to accord the provisions of the will with the actual intention of the deceased.
4 I make orders in accordance with the Short Minutes of Order, initialled by me, dated today and placed with the papers.
– oOo –
LAST UPDATED:
6 September 2010
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2010/989.html