AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of New South Wales

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of New South Wales >> 1999 >> [1999] NSWSC 179

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Humble v Poole [1999] NSWSC 179 (9 March 1999)

Last Updated: 8 June 1999

NEW SOUTH WALES SUPREME COURT

CITATION: Humble v. Poole [1999] NSWSC 179 revised - 04/06/99

CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division

FILE NUMBER(S): 1463/99

HEARING DATE{S): 9 March 1999

JUDGMENT DATE: 09/03/1999

PARTIES:

Kerry Frances Margaret Humble (P)

Christopher Poole by his tutor Miriam Poole (D)

JUDGMENT OF: Master McLaughlin

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Not Applicable

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): Not Applicable

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Not Applicable

COUNSEL:

SOLICITORS:

Mr. C. Burt

Ms. C. McAuliffe

CATCHWORDS:

ACTS CITED:

DECISION:

JUDGMENT:

- 2 -

SUPREME COURT OF

NEW SOUTH WALES

EQUITY DIVISION

MASTER McLAUGHLIN

Tuesday, 9 March 1999

1463/99 KERRY FRANCES MARGARET HUMBLE -v- CHRISTOPHER POOLE BY HIS TUTOR MIRIAM POOLE

JUDGMENT

1 MASTER: I have not been informed as to the basis upon which this matter has been brought before the Court, that is, whether it is grounded upon some statutory provision or upon some provision of the Rules.

2 It may be that the parties bring this application pursuant to the provisions of section 84 of the Trustee Act 1925. If that be so, then my reading of schedule D to the Supreme Court Rules indicates that a Master does not under that schedule have the power to make orders under that section.

3 It is open to the plaintiffs, if they so desire, to obtain an order from a Judge referring the hearing of the matter to a Master. Otherwise, upon what I have been informed by the legal representatives of the parties, it would seem to me that the matter would otherwise be dealt with by a Judge.

4 In any event, I do not consider that the evidence before the Court concerning the present financial and material circumstances of the defendant, who is an infant aged eleven years, is adequate to allow the Court to make an order of the nature sought in the notice of motion. In that regard, I note that, although the summons seeks approval of an agreement which includes a term that the plaintiff pay to the defendant the sum of $50,000, the agreement now reached between the parties seems to be that the plaintiff pay to the defendant the sum of $55,000.

5 The evidence filed on behalf of the plaintiff, being the affidavit of Kerry Frances Margaret Humble sworn 15 February 1999, is manifestly incomplete. Various annexures asserted to be attached thereto are not attached. Copies which are stated to be complete annexures will be retained in the file.

6 Also there will be retained a copy of the letters of administration with the Will annexed in respect to the estate of the late Hamish David Poole.

7 To enable the parties to give consideration to the various problems which have been disclosed during this morning's hearing, at the request of the parties I stand the matter over to Tuesday, 23 March, 1999 before the Registrar.

**********

LAST UPDATED: 04/06/1999


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/1999/179.html