AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

High Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> High Court of Australia >> 1927 >> [1927] HCA 9

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Help]

Dawson v R [1927] HCA 9; (1927) 40 CLR 206 (7 April 1927)

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Dawson Appellant ; and The King Respondent.

H C of A

On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

7 April 1927

Knox C.J. , Isaacs and Starke JJ.

Newell, in support of the application.—

Weigall, S.-G. for N.S.W., for the Crown,

Knox C.J. ,

Isaacs and Starke JJ.

Per Curiam. We do not think this is a case for special leave. Mr. Newell has said all that can be said in support of the application, but we see no reason to doubt the correctness of the judgment of the Supreme Court.

Special leave to appeal refused.

Solicitor for the applicant, C. D. W. Wray , Armidale, by Biddulph & Salenger .

Solicitor for the Crown, J. V. Tillett , Crown Solicitor for New South Wales.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1927/9.html