AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

High Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> High Court of Australia >> 1918 >> [1918] HCA 49

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Help]

Blume v R [1918] HCA 49; (1918) 25 CLR 300 (13 September 1918)

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Blume Appellant; and The King Respondent.

H C of A

On appeal from the Supreme Court of Queensland.

13 September 1918

Isaacs, Gavan Duffy and Rich JJ.

Mann, for the appellant.

Ryan A.-G. for Qd. and Mahoney, for the respondent, were not called upon.

Isaacs, Gavan Duffy and Rich JJ.

Per Curiam. The appeal must be dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Solicitors for the appellant, J. F. Fitzgerald & Walsh, Brisbane, by Dillon & Nichols.

Solicitor for the respondent, W. F. Webb, Crown Solicitor for Queensland.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1918/49.html