AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

High Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> High Court of Australia >> 1917 >> [1917] HCA 72

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Help]

Flint v Bannigan [1917] HCA 72; (1917) 24 CLR 162 (17 December 1917)

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Flint Defendant, Appellant; and Bannigan Informant, Respondent.

H C of A

On appeal from the Supreme Court of South Australia.

17 December 1917

Barton, Isaacs, Gavan Duffy and Rich JJ.

Cleland K.C., for the appellant.

Barton, Isaacs, Gavan Duffy and Rich JJ.

Per Curiam

We do not think that special leave to appeal should be granted in this case. We see no reason to differ from the conclusion at which the Supreme Court arrived. We do not discuss the reasons given for that decision.

Special leave to appeal refused.

Solicitor for the appellant, J. M. Napier.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1917/72.html