Norton v Clarke [1911] HCA 4; (1911) 12 CLR 13 (20 February 1911)

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Norton Defendant, Appellant; and Clarke Respondent, Plaintiff.

H C of A

On appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria.

20 February 1911

Griffith C.J., Barton, O'Connor, Isaacs and Higgins JJ.

Starke for the defendant.

Griffith C.J.,

Barton, O'Connor, Isaacs and Higgins JJ.

Per Curiam. We think there is no sufficient ground for doubting the correctness of the judgment of the Full Court. On the contrary, the reasons given by àBeckett J. seem to be conclusive to show that what was offered by the order of Cussen J. was all that the defendant was reasonably entitled to ask for.

Leave to appeal refused.

Solicitor for defendant, D. H. Herald.