AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

High Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> High Court of Australia >> 1909 >> [1909] HCA 88

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Help]

Mitchell v Brown [1909] HCA 88; (1909) 10 CLR 456 (16 December 1909)

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

H C of A

On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

16 December 1909

Griffith C.J., O'Connor and Isaacs JJ.

Loxton and Hammond, for the appellant.

Flannery, for the respondent.

Griffith C.J.,

O'Connor and Isaacs JJ.

The Court held that no important point of law was involved in the appeal, as the decision of the Court would only apply to the construction of the particular document in question in this case. The special leave was therefore rescinded, and the appeal dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitors, for the appellant, Hooke & Mein, Dungog, by Bowman & Mackenzie.

Solicitors, for the respondent, Logan & Carlton, West Maitland, by Sly & Russell.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1909/88.html