You are here:
AustLII >>
Databases >>
Federal Court of Australia >>
2010 >>
[2010] FCA 78
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Download]
[Help]
Corvette Resources Limited, In the matter of Corvette Resources Limited [2010] FCA 78 (9 February 2010)
Last Updated: 16 February 2010
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Corvette
Resources Limited, In the matter of Corvette Resources Limited
[2010] FCA 78
|
Citation:
|
Corvette Resources Limited, In the matter of Corvette Resources
Limited
|
|
|
|
Parties:
|
CORVETTE RESOURCES LIMITED
|
|
|
|
File number:
|
WAD 221 of 2009
|
|
|
|
Judge:
|
GILMOUR J
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment:
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation:
|
|
|
|
|
Cases cited:
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 December 2009, 9 February 2010
|
|
|
|
Place:
|
Perth
|
|
|
|
Division:
|
GENERAL DIVISION
|
|
|
|
Category:
|
No Catchwords
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs:
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Plaintiff:
|
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Plaintiff:
|
Steinepreis Paganin
|
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
|
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
|
|
|
|
|
IN THE MATTER OF CORVETTE RESOURCES LIMITED
(ABN 83 103 006
542)
|
CORVETTE RESOURCES LIMITED
(ABN 83 103 006 542)Plaintiff
|
|
|
|
|
DATE OF ORDER:
|
|
|
WHERE MADE:
|
|
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
- The
Scheme of Arrangement between the plaintiff and its members; and being Appendix
2 to the Scheme Booklet (which incorporates the
Explanatory Statement) which is
included in Annexure “PBM-11” to the affidavit of Patrick Bernard
McManus sworn 4 December
2009 and agreed to by a resolution of the members of
the plaintiff at a meeting of its members on 28 January 2010, be approved.
- The
plaintiff be exempted from compliance with s 411(11) of the Act.
- An
office copy of this Order be lodged with the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission within 14 days.
- These
orders have effect from the date of this order.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of
the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using
Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
|
|
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
|
|
|
GENERAL DIVISION
|
WAD 221 of 2009
|
IN THE MATTER OF CORVETTE RESOURCES LIMITED
(ABN 83 103 006
542)
|
CORVETTE RESOURCES LIMITED (ABN 83 103 006
542) Plaintiff
|
|
JUDGE:
|
GILMOUR J
|
|
DATE:
|
9 FEBRUARY 2010
|
|
PLACE:
|
PERTH
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
- The
plaintiff has applied for orders approving a scheme of arrangement (Scheme).
- On
21 December 2009 the Court granted leave to Corvette to convene a meeting for
the purpose of considering and, if thought fit,
approving the Scheme. The
purpose of the Scheme is to implement a merger in accordance with Part 5.1 of
the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) between Corvette and Tianshan Goldfields
Limited, a publicly listed company listed on the ASX. The Scheme is in a
customary
form with an exchange of listed shares whereby the members of Corvette
will receive two new Tianshan shares for each of their shares
in Corvette, which
are to be transferred to Tianshan. If approved and implemented, the Scheme will
result in Corvette becoming a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Tianshan.
- I
am satisfied that the formal requirements of Part 5.1 of the
Corporations Act have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the
requirements of s 411 of the Corporations Act have been met.
- The
Scheme meeting was held on 28 January 2010. The Scheme has been overwhelmingly
approved by members satisfying the majority requirements
under
s 411(4)(a)(ii) of the Corporations Act. ASIC was served on 4
February 2010 with a certified copy of the minutes of the shareholders meeting
and has had a reasonable time
to examine the terms of the Scheme and to make
submissions to the Court. ASIC has, however, provided written notice that it
does
not intend to appear at today’s hearing and that it has no objection
to the Scheme.
- There
is no evidence to suggest that the Scheme has been proposed other than in good
faith and for a proper purpose. There is nothing
in Corvette’s
constitution which is contrary to the Scheme. The conditions precedent to the
implementation of the Scheme,
save for that which requires its approval by this
Court have been either satisfied or waived. In the independent expert’s
report, forming part of the Scheme booklet and which is annexed to the affidavit
of Casey Jessie Grimshaw sworn 2 February 2010,
the independent expert has
concluded that the Scheme is “not fair but reasonable” and that, in
the circumstances, is
in the best interests of the Scheme participants.
- The
independent expert arrived at this conclusion after considering a number of
factors in assessing the reasonableness of the Scheme
including:
(a) Corvette’s need for cash in the immediate term and Tianshan’s
strong cash position and the fact that there are no
other assets to apply those
funds towards;
(b) the creation of a large Merged Entity which may place the Merged Entity in a
stronger position to take further strategic acquisitions
in the minerals
exploration industry; and
(c) the likely increasing liquidity of the proposed merged groups securities.
- This
application, in that respect, is similar to the position in the case of GRD
Limited (2009) FCA 1595 and what I had to say there at paras [28]-[31] is
apt to this case so far as it concerns the independent expert’s conclusion
that the Scheme is not fair but reasonable. I am satisfied that the Scheme is
in the best interests of the scheme participants.
- There
will be orders approving the Scheme in terms of Corvette’s minute of
proposed orders dated 5 February 2010.
I certify that the preceding eight (8) numbered
paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable
Justice
Gilmour.
|
Associate:
Dated: 9 February 2010
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2010/78.html