AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

Federal Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Federal Court of Australia >> 2002 >> [2002] FCA 162

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

VAP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 162 (27 February 2002)

Last Updated: 28 February 2002

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VAP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 162

VAP v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

V 1123 OF 2001

SUNDBERG, MARSHALL AND WEINBERG JJ

MELBOURNE

27 FEBRUARY 2002

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V 1123 OF 2001

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

VAP

APPELLANT

AND:

THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

JUDGES:

SUNDBERG, MARSHALL AND WEINBERG JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

27 FEBRUARY 2002

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The appeal be dismissed.

2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V 1123 OF 2001

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

VAP

APPELLANT

AND:

THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

JUDGES:

SUNDBERG, MARSHALL AND WEINBERG JJ

DATE:

27 FEBRUARY 2002

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1 In our reasons for judgment delivered today in VAO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 161 we dismissed the appeal in that matter. This appeal was heard together in the appeal in VAO. No separate or distinguishable ground of appeal was raised in this appeal which would result in the appeal being allowed if the appeal in VAO were dismissed. Consequently for the reasons we gave in VAO this appeal will also be dismissed with costs.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Sundberg, Marshall and Weinberg JJ.

Associate:

Dated: 27 February 2002

Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr S McLeish

Solicitor for the Appellant:

Satchi & Co

Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr W Mosley

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor

Date of Hearing:

26 February 2002

Date of Judgment:

27 February 2002


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2002/162.html