You are here:
AustLII >>
Databases >>
Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia >>
2010 >>
[2010] AATA 37
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Download]
[Help]
Smith and Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2010] AATA 37 (20 January 2010)
Last Updated: 20 January 2010
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2010] AATA 37
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No 2009/5914
|
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION
|
|
|
Re
|
|
Applicant
|
And
|
Secretary, Department of Families, Housing,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
|
Respondent
DECISION
Date 20 January 2010
Place Sydney
|
Decision
|
The Tribunal refuses to grant an extension of
time to the Applicant to lodge an application for review.
|
...................[sgd]...........................
Ms N Bell, Senior
Member
CATCHWORDS - Social Security
- extension of time – crisis payment – family tax benefit - merit of
application –
delay in application
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975
Social Security Act 1991
REASONS FOR DECISION
- On
14 December 2009, Ms Smith made an application to the Administrative Appeals
Tribunal under section 29(7) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act
1975 to extend the time period beyond 28 days to make an application for
review of the decisions of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal
of 5 December
2006 and
1 October 2009.
- Ms
Smith stated the reason for the delay was because of several periods of
homelessness and that she suffered post traumatic stress
disorder. However, it
is unclear whether the periods of homelessness experienced by Ms Smith
correspond to the period of delay for
the respective applications. It is also
noted that Ms Smith confirmed that she has been in her current shared
accommodation living
arrangements for the last 6 months during which the SSAT
delivered its decision of
1 October 2009 and the subsequent period for
filing an application expired. Ms Smith also did not provide any evidence as to
how her
post traumatic stress disorder has contributed to the delay in the
lodging of the applications.
- The
SSAT’s decision of 5 December 2006 was a review of the decision to cancel
Ms Smith’s family tax benefit from 20 January
2005. However, in her
evidence to this Tribunal, Ms Smith agreed that her children left her care in
January 2005. It follows that, from that time she was not eligible to
receive the family tax benefit. The Tribunal can find no merit
in the
application for the review of this decision.
- The
SSAT’s decision of 1 October 2009 was a review of a decision to refuse a
claim made on 2 July 2009 for crisis payment in
relation to an incident in 2004.
Ms Smith’s evidence was that she was forced to leave her home because
her husband had ceased to pay the rent and she was subsequently
evicted. These
circumstances do not qualify Ms Smith for the receipt of a crisis payment under
section 1061JH(1) of the Social Security Act 1991. Nor do the
circumstances match those provided for by section 1061JHA(1) of the Act which,
in any event, did not commence to operate until 1 January 2007 and are therefore
not applicable to the circumstances
of Ms Smith in 2004. It is also noted that
in relation to both provisions, the legislation further requires that an
application for
a crisis payment must be filed within 7 days of the occurrence
of the incident in question. Therefore, the application for the review
of this
decision has no merit.
- For
the reasons outlined above, as to the reasons for delay in the application and
the lack of merit in the respective applications,
the Tribunal refuses to grant
an extension of time to Ms Smith to lodge an application for review.
I certify that the
5 preceding paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for the decision herein of
Senior Member Bell
Signed:..............................[sgd].............................................
Associate: Lloyd Doherty
Date of Hearing 11 January 2010
Date of Decision 20 January 2010
Date of written reasons 20 January 2010
Representative for the Applicant Self-represented
Representative for the Respondent Ms Raewyn Harlock, Centrelink Legal
Services
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/AATA/2010/37.html