AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

Federal Magistrates Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Federal Magistrates Court of Australia >> 2010 >> [2010] FMCA 38

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

BRGAQ of 2008 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 38 (22 January 2010)

[AustLII] Federal Magistrates Court of Australia

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Help]

BRGAQ of 2008 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 38 (22 January 2010)

Last Updated: 27 January 2010

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BRGAQ OF 2008 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR

MIGRATION – Costs.

Applicant:
BRGAQ OF 2008

First Respondent:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP

Second Respondent:
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

File Number:
BRG 689 of 2008

Judgment of:
Wilson FM

Hearing dates:
30 January 2009 & 20 March 2009

Date of Last Submission:
4 September 2009

Delivered at:
Brisbane

Delivered on:
22 January 2010

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant:
Dr Azzi

Solicitors for the Applicant:
N/A

Counsel for the first Respondent:
Ms Wheatley

Solicitors for the first Respondent:
Clayton Utz

Counsel for the second Respondent:
Ms Wheatley

Solicitors for the second Respondent:
Clayton Utz

ORDERS

(1) The First Respondent shall pay the Applicant’s costs fixed in the sum of Three Thousand dollars ($3,000.00).
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
BRISBANE

BRG 689 of 2008

BRGAQ OF 2008

Applicant


And


MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 19 August 2009 I published reasons for my orders quashing the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal signed 15 September 2008. I ordered that any submissions on behalf of the Applicant as to costs be filed and served on or before 28 August 2009, and that any submissions on behalf of the First Respondent as to costs be filed and served on or before 4 September 2009.
  2. Neither party filed submissions.
  3. In my reasons for judgment at paragraph [93] – [99] I dealt with the issue of costs. I foreshadowed a provisional view that the Applicant should recover his costs fixed in the sum of $3,000.00. I invited the parties to make submissions if they contended for any other costs order. As I have said neither party has filed any submissions. I will therefore formalise the order as to costs.

I certify that the preceding 3Error! Style not defined.!Syntax Error, !Error! Style not defined.Error! Style not defined.!Syntax Error, !threethree (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Wilson FM


Associate: Lynnette Chin


Date: 22 January 2010


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FMCA/2010/38.html