![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Federal Court of Australia - Full Court |
Last Updated: 11 March 2008
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Home Affairs v Tervonen (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 32
MINISTER
FOR HOME AFFAIRS v JAN TERVONEN (NO 2)
NSD 2227 OF
2007
JACOBSON, BENNETT & BUCHANAN JJ
10 MARCH
2008
SYDNEY
ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A SINGLE JUDGE
OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
BETWEEN:
|
MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS
Appellant |
|
AND:
|
JAN TERVONEN
Respondent |
|
DATE OF ORDER:
|
|
|
WHERE MADE:
|
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 3 made on 6 March 2007 be set aside.
2. It be declared that the document dated 30 April 2007 signed by Senator Johnston is not a valid notice under s 16(1) of the Extradition Act 1988 with respect to the offences listed in [55], [57] and [58].
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
1 In [78] of our reasons given on 6 March 2008 (see Minister for Home Affairs v Tervonen [2008] FCAFC 24), we set out our understanding of the paragraphs of the Amended Notice that were conceded by the Minister. This was reflected in [96] and in Order 3.
2 We delayed entry of Order 3 for 72 hours in case our understanding was not correct.
3 We have now been informed by the Minister’s solicitors that [24] to [50] of the Amended Notice were not conceded and that Mr Ash, counsel for the respondent, concurs that the abovementioned paragraphs of our reasons and Order 3 should be amended accordingly.
4 It follows that [78] and [96] of our reasons are amended to delete reference to [24]-[50] of the Amended Notice. The same amendment will be made to Order 3.
5 For clarity, our orders will be that we set aside Order 3 made on 6 March 2008 and, in lieu thereof, order that it be declared that the document dated 30 April 2007 signed by Senator Johnston is not a valid notice under s 16(1) of the Extradition Act 1988 with respect to the offences listed in [55], [57] and [58].
|
I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy
of the Supplementary Reasons for Judgment herein of the
Court.
|
Associate:
Dated: 10 March 2008
|
Counsel for the Appellant:
|
Mr R Beech-Jones SC with Ms K Morgan
|
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Appellant:
|
Blake Dawson
|
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
Mr D Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Hearing:
|
15 February 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Judgment:
|
10 March 2008
|
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2008/32.html