You are here:
AustLII >>
Databases >>
Federal Court of Australia >>
2011 >>
[2011] FCA 51
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Download]
[Help]
Biermann v The State of New South Wales [2011] FCA 51 (2 February 2011)
Last Updated: 4 February 2011
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Biermann v The State of New South Wales [2011] FCA
51
|
Citation:
|
Biermann v The State of New South Wales [2011] FCA 51
|
|
|
|
Parties:
|
DIETER BIERMANN and URSULA BIERMANN v THE
STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
|
|
|
|
File number(s):
|
NSD 1783 of 2010
|
|
|
|
Judge:
|
JAGOT J
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment:
|
|
|
|
|
Catchwords:
|
BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – effect of
disclaimer of trustee in bankruptcy on rights of third parties
|
|
|
|
Legislation:
|
|
|
|
|
Cases cited:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place:
|
Sydney
|
|
|
|
Division:
|
GENERAL DIVISION
|
|
|
|
Category:
|
Catchwords
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs:
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Applicants:
|
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicants:
|
Pope and Spinks Lawyers
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
The respondent did not appear
|
|
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIETER BIERMANN First
Applicant
URSULA BIERMANN Second Applicant
|
|
AND:
|
THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH
WALESRespondent
|
|
|
|
|
DATE OF ORDER:
|
|
|
WHERE MADE:
|
|
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
-
Pursuant to s 133(9) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the title of the
property situated at 289 Conadilly Street, Gunnedah NSW (being Lot 42 in DP
222836) (the Gunnedah property) vest in the applicants.
- After
the sale of the Gunnedah property, the applicants must deliver to the trustee of
the bankrupt estate of Steven James Coughlin
accounts of how the proceeds of the
sale are dealt with, together with the whole of the proceeds of sale remaining
(if any) after
first deducting from the proceeds all moneys due to the
applicants as mortgagees, including all costs properly incurred and incidental
to the sale.
- There
be no order as to costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of
the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using
Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
|
|
|
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
|
|
|
GENERAL DIVISION
|
NSD 1783 of 2010
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
DIETER BIERMANN First Applicant
URSULA BIERMANN Second Applicant
|
|
AND:
|
THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Respondent
|
|
JUDGE:
|
JAGOT J
|
|
DATE:
|
2 FEBRUARY 2011
|
|
PLACE:
|
SYDNEY
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
- This
is an application seeking an order pursuant to s 133(9) of the Bankruptcy Act
1966 (Cth) (the Act) vesting title of the property situated at
289 Conadilly Street, Gunnedah, New South Wales (being Lot 42 in DP222836)
(the Gunnedah property) in the applicants.
- The
application is made in the following circumstances.
- Section
133(9) of the Act provides that:
[t]he Court may, on application by a person either claiming an interest in, or
being under a liability not discharged by this Act
in respect of, disclaimed
property, and after hearing such persons as it thinks fit, make an order, on
such terms as the Court considers
just and equitable, for the vesting of the
property in, or delivery of the property to, a person entitled to it or a person
in whom,
or to whom, it seems to the Court to be just and equitable that it
should be vested or delivered, or a trustee for that
person.
- Under
s 133(10):
[s]ubject to subsection (11), where an order vesting property in a person is
made under subsection (9), the property to which it
relates vests forthwith in
the person named in the order for that purpose without any conveyance, transfer
or assignment.
- The
application is supported by an affidavit of Ursula Biermann, the second-named
applicant. Ms Biermann’s affidavit establishes
the following sequence of
events. On 6 March 2009 a sequestration order was made against Steven James
Coughlin in the Federal Magistrates
Court of Australia. According to Ms
Biermann there was an unsuccessful application for review of that order.
- The
trustee in bankruptcy of Mr Coughlin’s estate is G.S. Turner. Mr Coughlin
was the registered proprietor of the Gunnedah
property. According to Ms
Biermann’s affidavit, on 7 September 2006 she and her husband lent Mr
Coughlin the sum of $112,000
(the loan). Security for the loan was
provided by a first registered mortgage over the Gunnedah property. Mr Coughlin
defaulted in making
repayments.
- The
certificate of title for the Gunnedah property shows as one of the dealings a
registered mortgage to the applicants, Dieter Biermann
and Ursula Charlotte
Biermann. The Gunnedah property is a noodle bar located in the main street of
Gunnedah. According to Ms Biermann
the property is currently occupied, but to
the best of her knowledge there is no current lease. Ms Biermann has had some
contact
with the tenant, who indicated that she was still paying rent to Mr
Coughlin.
- Mr
Coughlin’s trustee in bankruptcy, by a letter dated 30 March 2010,
disclaimed the Gunnedah property. The trustee stated
that:
pursuant to section 133(1AA) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 I hereby disclaim any
interest in the land comprised in Folio Identifier
42/222836.
- Under
ss 133(1AA) and 133(1) of the Act a trustee may disclaim onerous property, the
effect of which is that the property vests in the State of New South Wales
(the State), the respondent in this proceeding.
- Mr
Cutler, for the applicants, has drawn my attention to the decision of Bennett J
in National Australia Bank Limited v The State of Victoria [2010] FCA
1230 (NAB v Victoria). In that decision her Honour noted that
while the question of the effect of a trustee’s disclaimer is of
“some interest
and complexity”, the practical effect for a person in
the position of the applicants (that is, a person having the benefit
of a
mortgage over the land disclaimed) is that they cannot deal with the land
because the bankrupt’s interest in it has been
fully discharged by the
disclaimer of the trustee in bankruptcy. However, as Bennett J also observed in
the same case, the disclaimer
by the trustee in bankruptcy does not affect the
rights and liabilities of third parties (the third parties in this case being
the
applicants). Bennett J concluded that the mortgagees in the case of NAB
v Victoria retained their rights and interest in the land notwithstanding
the trustee’s disclaimer and the vesting of the land in the
Crown, the
combined effect of which was that the mortgagee could take no action because the
Crown had no obligation under the mortgages.
In those circumstances, Bennett J
determined that s 133(9) was enlivened and made an order for the vesting of the
properties in the mortgagee.
- Orders
to the same effect are sought in this case. Ms Biermann’s affidavit
discloses that the amounts owing under the loan
far exceed the estimated current
value of the Gunnedah property. The applicants are registered mortgagees, and
the trustee’s
disclaimer leaves them in the same difficult position in
which the NAB found itself in NAB v Victoria. The trustee in bankruptcy
through his solicitors, MP Lawyers, has said as follows by a letter dated 31
January 2011:
[w]e are instructed to confirm that the Trustee for the bankrupt estate of Mr
Coughlin does not oppose Orders 1 and 2 of the orders
to be sought in the
Application dated 20 December 2010 and filed in the Federal Court of
Australia.
- Accordingly,
the trustee in bankruptcy has no objection to the making of the vesting order
sought.
- Similarly,
there is on the Court’s file a submitting appearance by the respondent,
the State (the owner of the Gunnedah property
by reason of the trustee’s
disclaimer), indicating that it submits to any order of the Court, save as to
costs. In circumstances
where Mr Coughlin’s interests in the Gunnedah
property have been divested by the trustee’s disclaimer, and where there
is evidence before me that the amounts of money owing to the applicants as
registered mortgagees far exceed the value of the Gunnedah
property, I am
satisfied that it is just and equitable for a vesting order to be made as
sought.
I certify that the preceding thirteen (13)
numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the
Honourable
Justice Jagot.
|
Associate:
Dated: 4 February 2011
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2011/51.html