AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

Federal Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Federal Court of Australia >> 2006 >> [2006] FCA 959

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

SZAXY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 959 (27 July 2006)

Last Updated: 4 August 2006

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZAXY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 959




































SZAXY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 1076 OF 2006


MOORE J
27 JULY 2006
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 1076 OF 2006

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:
SZAXY
Applicant
AND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent

JUDGE:
MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER:
27 JULY 2006
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY


THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs.


Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 1076 OF 2006

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:
AND:

DATE:
PLACE:

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of a Federal Magistrate of 30 January 2006 summarily dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal of 19 May 2003: see SZAXY v Minister for Immigration [2006] FMCA 104. His Honour found that the proceedings were barred by the principles of res judicata or Anshun estoppel, or alternatively, were an abuse of the Court's process. Those conclusions were reached against a background where the applicant had brought three previous proceedings, all of which were unsuccessful, in relation to the same Tribunal decision, first in the Federal Magistrates Court, then this Court and ultimately in the High Court: see SZAXY v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 743, SZAXY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 76, SZAXY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCATrans 410.
2The applicant was notified by letter dated 7 July that the matter was listed for hearing this afternoon. The matter has been called. There has been no appearance on behalf of the applicant.
3On the application of the Minister I dismiss the application with costs for want of prosecution. I order that the applicant pay the first respondent's costs.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.



Associate:

Dated: 4 August 2006

Counsel for the Respondent:
Mr J Mitchell


Solicitor for the Respondent:
Blake Dawson Waldron


Date of Hearing:
27 July 2006


Date of Judgment:
27 July 2006




AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2006/959.html