SZIAM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1549 (8 November 2006)

Last Updated: 17 November 2006

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZIAM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1549

MIGRATION – no appearance by appellant



Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2B)(bb)(ii)




























SZIAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 1004 OF 2006

SPENDER J
8 NOVEMBER 2006
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	NSD 1004 OF 2006

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:	SZIAM Appellant
AND:	MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent

JUDGE:	SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER:	8 NOVEMBER 2006
WHERE MADE:	SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The appeal be dismissed.

2. The appellant pay the first respondent’s costs in the sum of $1200.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	NSD 1004 OF 2006

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:	SZIAM Appellant
AND:	MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent

JUDGE:	SPENDER J
DATE:	8 NOVEMBER 2006
PLACE:	SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1 This appeal is from orders in judgment of Federal Magistrate Scarlett given on 3 May 2006. His Honour dismissed an application for judicial review filed in the Federal Magistrates Court on 3 January 2006 seeking review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (‘The Tribunal’) handed down on 24 November 2005. The Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister given on 8 August 2004 not to grant the appellant a Protection (Class XA) Visa.
2 When the appeal was called on today there was no appearance by the appellant.
3 I am satisfied that he has been given notice of his appeal. In particular, a letter posted to him at his nominated address for service on 31 October 2006 by express post, notifying of his appeal, has not been returned unclaimed. There is other correspondence both from the first respondent, the solicitors for the first respondent and from the Court which notified him of this appeal which was sent to his address for service and has not been returned unclaimed.
4 In the circumstances I dismiss the appeal pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
5 I order that the respondent pay the first respondent’s costs which I fix in the sum of $1200.

I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Spender.

Associate:

Dated: 16 November 2006

No appearance by the Appellant.

Solicitor for the Respondent:	Ms Bernadette Rayment
Date of Hearing:	8 November 2006
Date of Judgment:	8 November 2006