AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

Federal Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Federal Court of Australia >> 2005 >> [2005] FCA 1219

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland v Ministerfor Environment & Heritage [2005] FCA 1219 (19 August 2005)

Last Updated: 6 September 2005

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland v Minister for Environment & Heritage [2005] FCA 1219


































WILDLIFE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAND PROSERPINE/WHITSUNDAY BRANCH INC v MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE, BOWEN CENTRAL COAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD AND QCOAL PTY LTD

QUD 216 of 2005



DOWSETT J
19 AUGUST 2005
BRISBANE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 216 OF 2005

BETWEEN:
WILDLIFE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAND PROSERPINE/WHITSUNDAY BRANCH INC
APPLICANT
AND:
MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE
FIRST RESPONDENT

BOWEN CENTRAL COAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT



QCOAL PTY LTD
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
19 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE


THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Bowen Central Coal Management Pty Ltd be joined as the second respondent.
2.QCoal Pty Ltd be joined as the third respondent.














Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 216 OF 2005

BETWEEN:
WILDLIFE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAND PROSERPINE/WHITSUNDAY BRANCH INC
APPLICANT
AND:
MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE
RESPONDENT

BOWEN CENTRAL COAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT



QCOAL PTY LTD
THIRD RESPONDENT

JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE:
19 AUGUST 2005
PLACE:
BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1 There are two notices of motion, both filed on 12 August 2005, by which Bowen Central Coal Management Pty Ltd and QCoal Pty Ltd seek to be joined as respondents. The applicant seeks to make such joinder conditional upon its not being exposed to an order for costs in favour of those parties in the event that it fails in the proceedings.

2 In my view the question of costs is best addressed after the case has been determined. Costs are discretionary. At this stage it would be quite inappropriate to limit either the entitlement or the liability for costs. I do not propose to do so.

3 There will be an order that both parties be joined.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.


Associate:

Dated: 2 September 2005

Counsel for the Applicant:
Mr S Keim SC
Mr C McGrath


Solicitor for the Applicant:
Environmental Defenders Office of Northern Queensland Inc


Counsel for the First Respondent:
Mr M Swan


Solicitor for the First Respondent:
Australian Government Solicitor


Counsel for the Second Respondent:
Mr D J S Jackson QC


Solicitor for the First Respondent:
Allens Arthur Robinson


Counsel for the Third Respondent:
Mr D Gore QC
Mr D Clothier


Solicitor for the Third Respondent:
Clayton Utz


Date of Hearing:
19 August 2005


Date of Judgment:
19 August 2005


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2005/1219.html