Applicant S230/2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1189 (25 August 2005)

Last Updated: 26 August 2005

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Applicant S230/2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1189

APPLICANT S230/2003 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

N 1006 OF 2003


MADGWICK J
25 AUGUST 2005
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	N 1006 OF 2003

BETWEEN:	APPLICANT S230/2003 APPLICANT
AND:	REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL FIRST RESPONDENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS SECOND RESPONDENT MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE:	MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER:	25 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE:	SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The application be declined.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	N 1006 OF 2003

BETWEEN:	APPLICANT S230/2003 APPLICANT
AND:	REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL FIRST RESPONDENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS SECOND RESPONDENT MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE:	MADGWICK J
DATE:	25 AUGUST 2005
PLACE:	SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

MADGWICK J:

1 This is an application remitted by the High Court seeking an order nisi for the issue of Constitutional writs.

2 Neither the materials filed in support of the application nor the applicant’s submissions show an arguable case for the making of such an order.

3 I therefore decline to make an order nisi.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick.

Associate:

Dated: 25 August 2005