AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

Federal Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Federal Court of Australia >> 2004 >> [2004] FCA 529

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

SZBRB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 529 (21 April 2004)

Last Updated: 3 May 2004

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZBRB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural &
Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 529





































SZBRB v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL
& INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

N 368 of 2004

LINDGREN J
21 APRIL 2004
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 368 OF 2004

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT

BETWEEN:
SZBRB
APPELLANT
AND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
LINDGREN
DATE OF ORDER:
21 APRIL 2004
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The appeal be dismissed.

2. The appellant pay the respondent’s costs.

3. The amount of the costs referred to in order 2 be fixed at $650.

















Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 368 OF 2004

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:
SZBRB
APPELLANT
AND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
LINDGREN
DATE:
21 APRIL 2004
PLACE:
SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1 The parties agree that this appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia be dismissed. They disagree over costs. The appellant says she cannot pay. That is not a reason for not making an order, although it may be a reason why the respondent will not seek to enforce it.

2 I have been asked to fix the amount of the costs and am told that on a solicitor client basis that amount is some $1,000. I will fix costs at $650.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Lindgren.


Associate:

Dated: 3 May 2004

The Appellant appeared in person.



Solicitor for the Respondent:
Ms Zarucki of Clayton Utz


Date of Hearing:
21 April 2004


Date of Judgment:
21 April 2004


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2004/529.html