AustLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

Federal Court of Australia

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Federal Court of Australia >> 2001 >> [2001] FCA 94

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 94 (29 January 2001)

Last Updated: 26 February 2001

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[2001] FCA 94

OLGA DRANICHNIKOV v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs AND MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Q 89 of 2000

DOWSETT J

29 JANUARY 2001

BRISBANE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 89 OF 2000

BETWEEN:

OLGA DRANICHNIKOV

APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

FIRST RESPONDENT

MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

SECOND RESPONDENT

MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

THIRD RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

29 JANUARY 2001

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 89 OF 2000

BETWEEN:

OLGA DRANICHNIKOV

APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

SECOND RESPONDENT

MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

THIRD RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE:

29 JANUARY 2001

PLACE:

BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1 There is no reason why costs should not follow the event. I order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings. As to the impecuniosity of the applicant, that is a matter which may or may not be treated as relevant by the Minister in determining whether or not to enforce the order.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.

Associate:

Dated: 15 February 2001

The Applicant appeared in person.

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Mr J Bishop, Australian Government Solicitor

Date of Hearing:

29 January 2001

Date of Judgment:

29 January 2001


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2001/94.html